lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:31:34 +0800 From: "Peer Chen" <pchen@...dia.com> To: "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org> Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "IDE/ATA development list" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] drivers/ata: correct a wrong free function for sata_nv driver Sorry for posting a fault patch,following is the right one. Signed-off-by: Peer Chen <pchen@...dia.com> =================================== --- linux-2.6.22-rc1/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c.orig +++ linux-2.6.22-rc1/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c @@ -1619,7 +1619,7 @@ static void nv_remove_one (struct pci_de struct nv_host_priv *hpriv = host->private_data; ata_pci_remove_one(pdev); - kfree(hpriv); + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, hpriv); } #ifdef CONFIG_PM ============================= BRs Peer Chen -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jeff@...zik.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 1:21 PM To: Peer Chen Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; akpm@...ux-foundation.org; IDE/ATA development list Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/ata: correct a wrong free function for sata_nv driver Peer Chen wrote: > For sata_nv driver in kernel 2.6.21 onward, Inside nv_init_one(),use > 'hpriv = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*hpriv), GFP_KERNEL);' but > using the kfree(hpriv) to free that data struction in nv_remove_one(), > which will cause system hang when removing the sata_nv module. > > Change the 'kfree()' function to 'devm_kfree' will fix this bug. > > The patch base on kernel 2.6.22-rc1. > > Signed-off-by: Peer Chen <pchen@...dia.com> > ===================================== > --- linux-2.6.22-rc1/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c.orig > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc1/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c > @@ -1619,7 +1619,7 @@ static void nv_remove_one (struct pci_de > struct nv_host_priv *hpriv = host->private_data; > > ata_pci_remove_one(pdev); > - kfree(hpriv); > + devm_kfree(&pci_dev->dev, hpriv); This patch is complete crap. It doesn't even compile. There is no variable "pci_dev" in this function at all. It is highly discouraging that you cannot even bother to compile your own submissions to the second (or third) most popular operating system in the world. Jeff ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists