linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lockdep: lock contention tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 May 2007 03:28:56 -0700
From:	Bill Huey (hui) <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: lock contention tracking

On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 03:19:46AM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > you got the history wrong i think: the first version of lockdep was 
> > released to lkml a year ago (May 2006), while the first time you 
> > mentioned your lock contention patch was November 2006 and you released 
> > it to lkml in December 2006 - so it was _you_ who was "replicating the 
> > same work", not lockdep :-) And this was pointed out to you very early 
> > on, many months ago.
> 
> Yeah, and where do we disagree here again ? So I take it you're disagreeing
> with my agreement with you that lockdep came first ? Geez, think about that
> one for a bit. (chuckle) :)

Yeah, sorry about the wording reversal. It was unintentional. I tend to drop
minor words like "not" and stuff which can create confusion.

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/