linux-kernel - [RFC] linux-2.6.22-rc2. SLUB report[kzalloc(0)]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 May 2007 06:05:02 +0400
From:	Dan Kruchinin <dubalom@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: [RFC] linux-2.6.22-rc2. SLUB report[kzalloc(0)]

Hi.

There is a BUG message from SLUB during boot process:
--
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.177484] BUG: at
include/linux/slub_def.h:77 kmalloc_index()
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.178355]  [<c01062ca>]
show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.179263]  [<c0106e72>] show_trace
+0x12/0x20
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.180177]  [<c0106ee6>] dump_stack
+0x16/0x20
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.181094]  [<c018440d>] get_slab
+0x1cd/0x260
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.182024]  [<c0185809>]
__kmalloc_track_caller+0x19/0xa0
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.183019]  [<c0170059>] __kzalloc
+0x19/0x50
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.184012]  [<df05586e>]
usb_get_configuration+0x9de/0x11c0 [usbcore]
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.185115]  [<df04cd07>]
usb_new_device+0x17/0x190 [usbcore]
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.186181]  [<df04e68a>] hub_thread
+0x79a/0xfd0 [usbcore]
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.187185]  [<c013b8e2>] kthread
+0x42/0x70
May 21 05:39:10 midgard kernel: [   31.188190]  [<c0105ea7>]
kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
--

kzalloc(0, GFP_KERNEL) occurs in drivers/usb/core/config.c in 
usb_get_configuration function. I already wrote about this slub bug
report and offered a
patch(http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0705.1/0154.html). I
don't know, may be it is not major thing, if it is, just ignore it. I
just think, that 
--
	length = ncfg * sizeof(struct usb_host_config);
	dev->config = kzalloc(length, GFP_KERNEL);
--
isn't clear, because ncfg - in my case - is 0 and I suppose, that size
of the leastest slab cache can become(in future) smaller than
sizeof(struct usb_host_config).

Thanks for attention.

-- 
Dan Kruchinin <dubalom@...il.com>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/