linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: swap prefetch improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 May 2007 12:46:48 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc:	Antonino Ingargiola <tritemio@...il.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>, ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: swap prefetch improvements


* Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org> wrote:

> On Tuesday 22 May 2007 20:25, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org> wrote:
> > > > > there was nothing else running on the system - so i suspect the
> > > > > swapin activity flagged 'itself' as some 'other' activity and
> > > > > stopped? The swapins happened in 4 bursts, separated by 5 seconds
> > > > > total idleness.
> > > >
> > > > I've noted burst swapins separated by some seconds of pause in my
> > > > desktop system too (with sp_tester and an idle gnome).
> > >
> > > That really is expected, as just about anything, including journal
> > > writeout, would be enough to put it back to sleep for 5 more seconds.
> >
> > note that nothing like that happened on my system - in the
> > swap-prefetch-off case there was _zero_ IO activity during the sleep
> > period.
> 
> Ok, granted it's _very_ conservative. [...]

but your first reaction was "it should not have slept for 5 seconds":

| Hmm.. The timer waits 5 seconds before trying to prefetch, but then 
| only stops if it detects any activity elsewhere. It doesn't actually 
| try to go idle in between
 
It clearly should not consider 'itself' as IO activity. This suggests 
some bug in the 'detect activity' mechanism, agreed? I'm wondering 
whether you are seeing the same problem, or is all swap-prefetch IO on 
your system continuous until it's done [or some other IO comes 
inbetween]?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/