linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 30 May 2007 17:09:21 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>,
	Julian Sikorski <belegdol@...il.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH} x86_64 PM_TRACE support.

On Wed, 30 May 2007 20:01:34 -0400 Dave Jones wrote:

> On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 04:32:54PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> 
> Hi Nigel,
> 
>  > As promised I took another look at the patch and at what Randy had
>  > prepared to fix the IA64 compilation error. I did some more work on it,
>  > and believe that the following is the tidiest correct solution I can
>  > come up with. It differs from the version that caused the compilation
>  > error primarily in that:
>  > 
>  > * the #include <asm/resume-trace.h> is inside the #ifdef 
>  >   CONFIG_PM_TRACE.
>  > * now-unnecessary protection for multiple #includes and ifdef testing of
>  >   CONFIG_PM_TRACE in the asm code were removed.
>  > * do-nothing definitions for !PM_TRACE restored to
>  >   include/linux/resume-trace.h.
>  > 
>  > We're therefore depending upon kernel/power/Kconfig having the right
>  > depends condition. As far as I can see, IA64 doesn't define CONFIG_X86.
>  > Is that correct, or do we need to have (X86 && !IA64)?
> 
> Can you post a copy of this that isn't mangled by quoted-printable encoding?
> Whilst it looks fine in my MUA, the diff ends up looking like..

yep :(

http://www.xenotime.net/linux/patches/x8664-pm-trace-support.patch

in case Nigel is asleep.


> I'm beginning to think we really need a Documentation/Unhorking-MUAs-HOWTO
> judging by the amount of broken encodings we seem to get to lkml these days.


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/