| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 11:11:11 -0500 From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: "K.R. Foley" <kr@...sft.com>, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed? On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:01:09PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * K.R. Foley <kr@...sft.com> wrote: > > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * K.R. Foley <kr@...sft.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Ingo, > > >> > > >> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to > > >> 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3. > > > > > > yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3. > > > > > > Ingo > > > > > > > So actually it is not really misnamed, it's just done a bit > > differently than previous versions. Sorry. > > yeah. Maybe we should make the 2.6.21.3 -rt patches relative to 2.6.21.3 > - but that would be one extra patching step for people who already have > a 2.6.21 tree. But ... maybe that makes the most sense after all. Including 2.6.21.3 in your patch will break ketchup. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists