lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:35:06 -0600
From:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To:	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] 1/2: MMCONFIG: validate against ACPI motherboard
 resources

Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:03:32PM -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
>> -Validate that the area is reserved even if we read it from the
>> chipset directly and not from the MCFG table. This catches the case
>> where the BIOS didn't set the location properly in the chipset and
>> has mapped it over other things it shouldn't have.
> 
> Just for the record, I still fundamentally disagree with that part.
> You're not catching what you think you're catching, since the chipset
> tells you what it is going to decode as mmconfig, no matter what is
> connected to it.

But we don't - not in the case where it's overlapped some other area 
with the MMCONFIG region. We saw a case of this on some of the Intel 
boards, where the MMCONFIG is a 128MB area at 0xf0000000, and when 
sizing the BARs on a PCI Express video device with a 256MB region, it 
ended up being located momentarily at f0000000-ffffffff, which 
overlapped the MMCONFIG area. That caused MMCONFIG to stop working, so 
apparently on that chipset, PCI Express devices connected to the 
northbridge have a higher decode priority than the MMCONFIG area.

If the BIOS is so screwed up that this becomes an issue, I don't think 
we can sanely try to use the table, since we can't anticipate all the 
potential problems that might result.

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ