[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:14:26 +0200
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
kbuild-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Another version of cleanfile/cleanpatch
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:50:26PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
[]
> > Many things in XXI century still can be done by tools founded 20-30
> > years ago. Why not try to?
>
> Because your shell script is unreadable by normal human beings[*]
> while the perl script for people with a bit of perl fu can read it
> and fix/modify it.
>
> We want tools that can be maintained and enhanced by most people.
>
> [*] Normal human beings are people with same level of shell
> scripting/sed skills that I have just to put that straight.
In many cases i think, it's limiting one's imagination and expanding
laziness[0].
In the school algebra (usually) there are many exercises with
plain-useless equations and formulas you must solve or simplify.
Guess why? Thus my proposition. ;)
---
[0] Now, when most UNIX tools done with good quality (courtesy of the
GNU project), it's time not to convert programmer's laziness[1] to
ordinary one. Why there's one big and slow Bourne again shell, yet
to have fast ([d]ash) and tiny one took more time? As result more
efforts to remove bashizms...
[1] Ironically connected to Perl chapter of UNIX Power Tools
<http://unix.org.ua/orelly/unix/upt/ch37_02.htm>
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists