linux-kernel - Re: fix placement of inline keyword.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:42:39 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fix placement of inline keyword.

On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 01:38:42AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
 > On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:30:35PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > 
 > > gcc gets whiney about the placement of 'inline' at some warning levels.
 > >...
 > 
 > Since most of them are in C files, can you remove these when you are at it?

I'm not that motivated.  I did these to reduce some warning noise
a while back.  I just wanted to toss this out there before I dropped
it on the floor.  If it gets applied, great, if not, I'm not going to
be too bothered.

In many cases, there are lots of other inlines in those drivers too,
so it's a bigger job than the obvious fix that I did.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/