linux-kernel - Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions with patches v3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2007 17:01:54 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc:	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paulo Pereira <pfmp.404@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [2/2] 2.6.22-rc4: known regressions with patches v3

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Greg KH wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:58:05PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> >  USB
> > 
> >  Subject    : list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794), but 
> >  was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33
> >  References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561
> >  Submitter  : Paulo Pereira <pfmp.404@...il.com>
> >  Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> >  Patch      : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8561#c8
> >  Status     : patch was suggested
> 
> I'm pretty sure this wasn't a "regression" and was always there, and
> that the proposed patch did fix the solution, right Paulo and Alan?

I'm also pretty sure that it's not a regression and that the patch 
should have fixed it.  But since Paolo hasn't replied to any of our 
queries, we can't be certain.

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/