linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH, 2nd try] make disable_console

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2007 00:08:00 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Stefan Seyfried <seife@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	suspend-devel List <suspend-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
	Frank Seidel <fseidel@...e.de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	nigel@...el.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, 2nd try] make disable_console_suspend runtime configurable

Hi!

> I hate having to recompile the kernel, just to be able to debug suspend.
> Remove CONFIG_DISABLE_CONSOLE_SUSPEND, replace it by a tunable in
> /sys/power/disable_console_suspend.

> Signed-off-by: Stefan Seyfried <seife@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Seidel <fseidel@...e.de>

I wonder if there's a better name?

Or maybe this should not be /sys configurable, but just have value for
each console "this console can work while suspended"?

(serial can, vesafb can, netconsole can't)?

Exporting "crash-me" option to user does not seem that cool to me.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/