| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:03:40 -0300 From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu Cc: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm, Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 On Jun 14, 2007, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: > If a company sells you hardware that includes a ROM that contains GPL'ed > software, are they in violation of the GPL if they don't include a ROM burner > in the hardware? Or are ROM burners like compilers, where you have to supply > your own? this requirement does not apply if neither you nor any third party retains the ability to install modified object code on the User Product (for example, the work has been installed in ROM). -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@...dhat.com, gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist oliva@...d.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists