linux-kernel - regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:29:14 +0200
From:	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Diego Calleja <diegocg@...il.com>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: regression tracking (Re: Linux 2.6.21)

* Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel
* Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:50:22 -0700 (PDT)

* From: Linus Torvalds
>
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> 
>> Besides the primary point of bug tracking is not to be friendly
>> to someone, but to (a) fix the bugs and (b) know how many bugs
>> there for a given release. Any replacement would need to solve
>> this problem too.
>> 
>> Email does not solve it as far as I can see.
>
> Email fixes a _lot_ more bugs than bugzilla does. 
>
> End of story. I don't think anybody who cannot accept that UNDENIABLE FACT 
> should even participate in this discussion. Wake up and look at all the 
> bugs we fix - most of them have never been in bugzilla.
>
> That's a FACT.
>
> Don't go around ignoring reality.

I'm seeing this long (198) thread and just have no idea how it has
ended (wiki? hand-mailing?).

Just two general questions to Adrian.

1) You was maintainer of the woody backports, isn't it[0]? Why you didn't
proposed (used) Debian's BTS as alternative to bugzilla, and how you did
your regression tracking?

What exactly doesn't fit? Full control by e-mail, comprehensive
management, ML handling/redirection, tagging, sorting, searching? Finally,
reportbug tool and web-inteface?

2) Your decision to stop activity, was that with debian because Sarge was
release with known security hole in the kernel[1]?

I'm just wonder.

[0] google: "woody backports Adrian Bunk"

[1] Message-ID: <20070331194728.GA31853@...erlinux.fr>
    Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel:27730
    [Just take your news readers and have fun with Gmane!]
    [For those, who don't know what it is -- web :]
    Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.kernel/27730>
--*--
    Unfortunately this message is from a man, who was punished in very
    unfair manner by "fellow developers". I'm not trying to rise this
    issue (sorry, if i'm trolling), just want to say, that life can be
    very unfair, when some wrong people are in power...
    
    Message-ID: <20070529053026.GA28352@...erlinux.fr>
    Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.linux.debian.devel.project:12330
    Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.project/12330>
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/