[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Carlo Wood <carlo@...noe.com>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@...hat.com>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@...er.net>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>, david@...g.hm,
Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Carlo Wood wrote:
>
> But then the paragraph from COPYING kicks in, reading:
Read the COPYING file more closely, and realize that "the Program" has
always specified a version number of this license.
It used to include it just by virtue of having the COPYING file *itself*
be included (and that's v2), but since some people felt that was unclear,
the COPYING file has this language pretty visibly at the top:
Also note that the only valid version of the GPL as far as the kernel
is concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not
v2.2 or v3.x or whatever), unless explicitly otherwise stated.
> Any, 'any version' probably includes version 3 as well.
Not for the kernel. Exactly because the kernel _does_ specify the version.
So the sequence you quoted is a non-issue.
In other words: any file that does not *explicitly* say that it's "v2 or
later" is v2 only.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists