linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: always requeue !fs requests at the front

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:08:47 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
CC:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	David Greaves <david@...eaves.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Chinner <dgc@....com>, xfs@....sgi.com,
	"'linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-pm <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: always requeue !fs requests at the front

Tejun Heo wrote:
> SCSI marks internal commands with REQ_PREEMPT and push it at the front
> of the request queue using blk_execute_rq().  When entering suspended
> or frozen state, SCSI devices are quiesced using
> scsi_device_quiesce().  In quiesced state, only REQ_PREEMPT requests
> are processed.  This is how SCSI blocks other requests out while
> suspending and resuming.  As all internal commands are pushed at the
> front of the queue, this usually works.
> 
> Unfortunately, this interacts badly with ordered requeueing.  To
> preserve request order on requeueing (due to busy device, active EH or
> other failures), requests are sorted according to ordered sequence on
> requeue if IO barrier is in progress.
> 
> The following sequence deadlocks.
> 
> 1. IO barrier sequence issues.
> 
> 2. Suspend requested.  Queue is quiesced with part or all of IO
>    barrier sequence at the front.
> 
> 3. During suspending or resuming, SCSI issues internal command which
>    gets deferred and requeued for some reason.  As the command is
>    issued after the IO barrier in #1, ordered requeueing code puts the
>    request after IO barrier sequence.
> 
> 4. The device is ready to process requests again but still is in
>    quiesced state and the first request of the queue isn't
>    REQ_PREEMPT, so command processing is deadlocked -
>    suspending/resuming waits for the issued request to complete while
>    the request can't be processed till device is put back into
>    running state by resuming.
> 
> This can be fixed by always putting !fs requests at the front when
> requeueing.
> 
> The following thread reports this deadlock.
> 
>   http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/537473
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
> Cc: Jenn Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> Cc: David Greaves <david@...eaves.com>

Acked-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>

Thanks Tejun, you kick ass as usual.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/