| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 11:02:19 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> To: Nobin Mathew <nobin.mathew@...il.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux Servers comparison with Windows 2003 servers for Gaming On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 07:42:50PM +0530, Nobin Mathew wrote: > I am trying to move my Game server from windows to Linux. > > Is this a good idea? > How much better performance i will get? > > Can i fine tune the 2.6.20 kernel to get better performance? > What all areas i can do this fine tuning? > > what other things i can do to get better performance? All this depends a lot on your workload. If you're CPU-bound, maybe it will not change anything. If you're doing a lot of disk accesses, the choice of the filesystem will be far more important than any config option you might change. If you're doing a lot of network traffic, you might consider not loading every unneeded network subsystem (ipv6, netfilter, bridging, ...) to save CPU cycles, though it does not seem to be your problem given your other mail indicating a 100 Mbps NIC. If you don't know what limits your application, it is possible that you will first run it with "standard" parameters (defaults from your distro), and later reinstall it differently once you have measured it usage. Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists