linux-kernel - Re: Change in default vm_dirty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:08:11 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
cc:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, davej@...hat.com,
	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Change in default vm_dirty_ratio

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:
> 
> Perhaps we want to throw some sliding window algorithms at it. We can
> bound requests and total I/O and if requests get retired too slowly we
> can shrink the windows. Alternately, we can grow the window if we're
> retiring things within our desired timeframe.

I suspect that would tend to be a good way to go. But it almost certainly 
has to be per-device, which implies that somebody would have to do some 
major coding/testing on this..

The vm_dirty_ratio thing is a global value, and I think we need that 
regardless (for the independent issue of memory deadlocks etc), but if we 
*additionally* had a per-device throttle that was based on some kind of 
adaptive thing, we could probably raise the global (hard) vm_dirty_ratio a 
lot.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/