linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] Make struct jprobe.entry a void *

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:35:49 +1000
From:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To:	ananth@...ibm.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Make struct jprobe.entry a void *

On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 09:29 +0530, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:48:50AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > ---
> > 
> > It isn't obvious where kprobes patches should go, is anyone "the" maintainer?
> > Instead I've just sent this to everyone who'd touched the code lately, or
> > might be otherwise interested.
> 
> There isn't a single maintainer for the kprobes infrastructure as it
> contains quite a bit of low level arch specific code. The working model
> currently is that the patches are sent to lkml with a cc to the
> maintainers listed, as you've rightly done.

OK, no worries. I guess that's a bit messy to put into a MAINTAINERS entry.

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)