linux-kernel - Re: Linux Kernel include files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:57:02 +0200
From:	Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@...-owl.de>
To:	Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de>
Cc:	dwmw2@...radead.org, schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, harald@...gtun.org, david@...g.hm
Subject: Re: Linux Kernel include files

On Thu, 2007-06-28 12:39:57 +0200, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...us.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > > > By the way, your mailer seems to be sometimes omitting In-Reply-To: and
> > > > References: headers, which RFC2822 says you SHOULD include in replies. 
> > > 
> > > Sending such accusation without knowing the reason is not polite.
> >
> > It's not an accusation -- it's merely an observation. You may not have
> > noticed that your mailer was misbehaving; now you _do_ know, and if you
> > care about RFC compliance you might want to fix it. You're not _obliged_
> > to fix it, of course. I just thought you'd like to know.
> 
> Well there you are: my mailer is definitely NOT missbehaving.
> Please do not repeat similar accusations when not knowing the reason.

Just out of interest: In which cases do you want to break threading?

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@...-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:              What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for
the second  :         others and the world remains and is immortal. (Albert Pine)

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)