linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][resend] Remove the last few UMSDOS leftovers.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 01 Jul 2007 12:50:07 -0400
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jacques Gelinas <jacques@...ucorp.qc.ca>,
	Matija Nalis <mnalis@...ager.hr>,
	Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@...ut.net>,
	Volker Lendecke <vl@....org>,
	Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>, Ian Molton <spyro@....com>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@...aya.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][resend] Remove the last few UMSDOS leftovers.

Jesper Juhl wrote:
> (originally from 28 May 2007, resending due to no response to this 
>  final version and not seeing the patch picked up anywhere)
> 
> 
> The UMSDOS filesystem was removed back in 2.6.11, but some tiny bits
> stuck around. This patch removes the few remaining leftovers.
> The only things left behind after this are the entries in the CREDITS file
> and the ioctl number in Documentation/ioctl-number.txt as documentation.
> 
> This third (hopefully final) version of the patch doesn't edit the 
> arch/um/config.release file, since Jeff Dike pointed out to me that it 
> should die completely, and asked me to remove it from my patch as
> he'll send in a seperate patch removing the file completely.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>

Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>


> ---
> 
>  Documentation/ioctl-number.txt |    2 +-
>  arch/arm26/defconfig           |    1 -
>  arch/cris/arch-v10/defconfig   |    1 -
>  include/linux/ncp_fs.h         |    2 --
>  4 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ioctl-number.txt b/Documentation/ioctl-number.txt
> index 3de7d37..5c7fbf9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ioctl-number.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/ioctl-number.txt
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ Code	Seq#	Include File		Comments
>  0x00	00-1F	linux/wavefront.h	conflict!
>  0x02	all	linux/fd.h
>  0x03	all	linux/hdreg.h
> -0x04	all	linux/umsdos_fs.h
> +0x04	D2-DC	linux/umsdos_fs.h	Dead since 2.6.11, but don't reuse these.
>  0x06	all	linux/lp.h
>  0x09	all	linux/md.h
>  0x12	all	linux/fs.h
> diff --git a/arch/arm26/defconfig b/arch/arm26/defconfig
> index c4a8970..2b7d44b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm26/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm26/defconfig
> @@ -248,7 +248,6 @@ CONFIG_I2C_CHARDEV=y
>  # CONFIG_JBD_DEBUG is not set
>  # CONFIG_FAT_FS is not set
>  # CONFIG_MSDOS_FS is not set
> -# CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS is not set
>  # CONFIG_VFAT_FS is not set
>  # CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set
>  # CONFIG_JFFS_FS is not set
> diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v10/defconfig b/arch/cris/arch-v10/defconfig
> index 2a3411e..710c20b 100644
> --- a/arch/cris/arch-v10/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/cris/arch-v10/defconfig
> @@ -429,7 +429,6 @@ CONFIG_NET_ETHERNET=y
>  # CONFIG_BFS_FS is not set
>  # CONFIG_FAT_FS is not set
>  # CONFIG_MSDOS_FS is not set
> -# CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS is not set
>  # CONFIG_VFAT_FS is not set
>  # CONFIG_EFS_FS is not set
>  # CONFIG_JFFS_FS is not set
> diff --git a/include/linux/ncp_fs.h b/include/linux/ncp_fs.h
> index 83e39eb..88766e4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ncp_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ncp_fs.h
> @@ -148,8 +148,6 @@ struct ncp_nls_ioctl
>  #include <linux/ncp_fs_i.h>
>  #include <linux/ncp_fs_sb.h>
>  
> -/* undef because public define in umsdos_fs.h (ncp_fs.h isn't public) */
> -#undef PRINTK
>  /* define because it is easy to change PRINTK to {*}PRINTK */
>  #define PRINTK(format, args...) printk(KERN_DEBUG format , ## args)
>  
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/