linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.13-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:03:26 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
	List util-linux-ng <util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.13-rc1

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 12:11:56AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
>>  The package build system is now based on autotools. The build system
>>  supports  separate CFLAGS and LDFLAGS for suid programs (SUID_CFLAGS,
>>  SUID_LDFLAGS). For more details see the README file
> 
> And this is really dumb.  autotools is a completely pain in the ass and
> not useful at all for linux-only tools.

A myth.  It is quite useful for packagers, because of the high Just 
Works(tm) factor.  After porting an entire across several revisions of a 
distro, the autotools-based packages are the ones that work out of the 
box 90% of the time.

The other 90% of _my_ time comes from annoying people who roll their own 
Makefile/build solution, which the packager has to then learn.

It's just not scalable for people to keep building their own build 
solutions.

	Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/