| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:01:27 +0100 From: Nix <nix@...eri.org.uk> To: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com> Cc: List util-linux-ng <util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] util-linux-ng 2.13-rc1 On 4 Jul 2007, DervishD stated: > Anyway, if you don't like mobs or you just don't want to try it, > that's fine, but please don't use autotools, it doesn't make much sense > for a linux only project, since you will be using only the "directory > choosing" part of autotools. Maybe a hand made script will help (and I Oh, yeah, great, another hand-rolled build system. That's *juwt* what those of us who have autotools working well (with config.site's that do all we need and then some) are looking forward to. There are advantages to standardization, you know. A *lot* of autobuilders know how to make autoconf-generated configure scripts jump through hoops. I was downright *happy* when util-linux was autoconfiscated: I could ditch the code to handle automatic configuration of yet another one-package hand-rolled build system. -- `... in the sense that dragons logically follow evolution so they would be able to wield metal.' --- Kenneth Eng's colourless green ideas sleep furiously - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists