lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:11:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...r.kernel.org, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, corey.d.gough@...el.com, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>, Erik Andersen <andersen@...epoet.org> Subject: Re: [patch 09/10] Remove the SLOB allocator for 2.6.23 On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > It is reasonable to expect some help from maintainers, but I notice you > didn't even CC the SLOB maintainer in the patch to remove SLOB! So maybe > if you tried working a bit closer with him you could get better results? The maintainers last patch to SLOB was the initial submission of the allocator. Then he acked subsequent patches. Most of the modifications to SLOB are my work. Attempts to talk to the maintainer result in inventive explanations why SLOB does not have to conform to kernel standards. There is no reasonable expectation that this will change. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists