linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] VFS: Augment /proc/mount with subroot and shared-subtree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 08:42:21 -0700
From:	Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] VFS: Augment /proc/mount with subroot and
	shared-subtree

On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 11:24 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 08:56:02AM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Is that conjecture, or do you have evidence to that effect?  Most users 
> > of this file are using it via the glibc interfaces, and there probably 
> > aren't all that many users of it in the first place.
> 
> I have written parsers for personal projects that might not have been
> happy to deal with additional fields myself for example..

I modified the patch to add fields towards the end of each line.
i.e after 'freq, passno' fields. And symlinked /etc/mtab
to /proc/mounts.
mount,df  and friends were all perfectly happy.  

I imagine your script may also be happy with the additional fields
**towards the end**. I would like to avoid one more mount interface if
we can help it.

RP



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/