linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] cleanup congestion control options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:10:34 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] cleanup congestion control options

On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:54:42PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 06:09:54 +0200
> 
> > This patch contains the following cleanups:
> > - note in the prompt if an option depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> > - remove "default n"s that didn't have any effect
> > - remove "default m"s from options under TCP_CONG_ADVANCED:
> >   if you manually choose congestion control modules you should
> >   know which ones you want
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
> 
> I'm not so sure about any of this, sorry Adrian, I'm
> not applying this.

What exactly are you not sure of?
- noting the experimental status in the prompt is a common convention
  in the kernel
- "default n"s like here are nops serving no purpose

This leaves only the removal of the "default m"s which I thought would 
be non-controversial since people seeing these options should know best
what they need.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/