linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] what should 'uptime' be on suspend?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:57:30 +0100
From:	Ken Moffat <zarniwhoop@...world.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
	Linux Kernel M/L <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] what should 'uptime' be on suspend?

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> man uptime:
> 	uptime - tell how long the system has been running
> 
> I claim that the system is not running when it is suspended,
> so the suspension time should not be included in uptime.
> 
 So, maybe I shouldn't have put corrected in inverted commas,
because this was a real correction and my previous usage was an
unintended side-effect of an error.

 Anyway, the current behaviour is known and I guess any attempt to
change it (e.g. to what Bill was expecting) won't be well received.

Ken
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/