linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Clean up on_each_cpu: should not fail, should not have "retry" arg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:44:09 -0700
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	arlied@...ux.ie, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	rth@...ddle.net, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up on_each_cpu: should not fail, should not have
 "retry" arg

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:07:14 +1000
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:

> Finally, either slub.c's flush_all() can be called with interrupts
> disabled on UP, or the #ifdef is gratuitous.  I assumed the latter.

Correct. flush_all() is always called with interrupts disabled. So its
gratuitous.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/