linux-kernel - Re: [lm-sensors] drivers/hwmon/lm93.c: array overruns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:00:00 +0200
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Hans-Jürgen Koch <hjk@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@...htlink.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] drivers/hwmon/lm93.c: array overruns

Hi Hans,

On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:26:46 +0200, Hans-Jürgen Koch wrote:
> Am Dienstag 24 Juli 2007 10:10 schrieb Jean Delvare:
> > However, I see that temp4 (which isn't a real temperature channel) is
> > not exposed in sysfs. Reading and storing register values you never use
> > doesn't seem particularly interesting, so something needs to be done
> > here: either drop support for temp4 entirely, or expose the temp4
> > values in sysfs.
> 
> I've got that on my TODO list. I'll soon work on that driver again. I'm still
> waiting for that #§$?& NDA-covered datasheet of the LM94. As soon as I've got
> that, I need to review all these values anyway because there might be subtle
> differences between LM93 and LM94.
> For the moment, I'd like to postpone the decision about what to do with temp4.

Sure, no problem.

-- 
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/