linux-kernel - Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 Jul 2007 18:41:07 -0400
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	honza@...os.cz, jkosina@...e.cz
Subject: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?

On 07/24/2007 06:00 PM, Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> On 07-07-24 16:57 Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> 
>>> $ strace ./cat
>>> execve("./cat", ["./cat"], [/* 55 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>>> ...
> 
> Chuck, my binaries run always into a segmentation violation. So
> ENOENT is not the issue. (Notify it was on an x86-64.)
> 

Okay, I tested with Fedora on x86_64 and it worked there too.
(Not that that proves much.)

Did you capture any of the error messages, like the address
of the segfault?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/