linux-kernel - CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:17:25 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, david@...g.hm,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: CONFIG_SUSPEND? (was: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1)

On Thursday, 26 July 2007 19:45, Len Brown wrote:
> On Thursday 26 July 2007 02:55, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Len Brown wrote:
> > > 
> > > Feel free to share what you know about the benefits vs. the costs
> > > of maintaining CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP as a build option.
> > 
> > Why don't you just make CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP dependent on SOFTWARE_SUSPEND 
> > and STR?
> 
> CONFIG_STR doesn't exist.

Hmm, perhaps we should introduce a CONFIG_SUSPEND and change
CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND into CONFIG_HIBERNATION, both depending on
CONFIG_PM?

There's quite some code needed only for suspend compiled in when CONFIG_PM is
set ...

Greetings,
Rafael


-- 
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/