lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:31:19 +0900 (JST)
From:	yamamoto@...inux.co.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi)
To:	menage@...gle.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dev@...ru, xemul@...ru,
	serue@...ibm.com, vatsa@...ibm.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	haveblue@...ibm.com, svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, balbir@...ibm.com,
	pj@....com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	rohitseth@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Task Containers(V11): Basic task container
 framework

> +Other fields in the container_subsys object include:

> +- hierarchy: an index indicating which hierarchy, if any, this
> +  subsystem is currently attached to. If this is -1, then the
> +  subsystem is not attached to any hierarchy, and all tasks should be
> +  considered to be members of the subsystem's top_container. It should
> +  be initialized to -1.

stale info?

> +struct container {

> +	struct containerfs_root *root;
> +	struct container *top_container;
> +};

can cont->top_container be different from than &cont->root.top_container?

YAMAMOTO Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ