linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, david@...g.hm,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_HIBERNATION and CONFIG_SUSPEND
 (updated)

Ok, I took this, and modified Len's patch to re-introduce ACPI_SLEEP on 
top of it (I took the easy way out, and just made PM_SLEEP imply 
ACPI_SLEEP, which should make everything come out right. I could have 
dropped ACPI_SLEEP entirely in favour of PM_SLEEP, but that would have 
implied changing more of Len's patch than I was really comfy with).

Len, Rafael, please do check that the end result looks ok. 

I suspect ACPI could now take the PM_SLEEP/SUSPEND/HIBERNATE details into 
account, and that some of the code is not necessary when HIBERNATE is not 
selected, for example, but I'm not at all sure that it's worth it being 
very fine-grained.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/