linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 31 Jul 2007 18:34:49 -0700
From:	"Yasha Okshtein" <flyashi@...il.com>
To:	"Jan Dittmer" <jdi@....org>
Cc:	"Andreas Schwab" <schwab@...e.de>, "Len Brown" <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Thomas Renninger" <trenn@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.23-rc1

On 7/28/07, Jan Dittmer <jdi@....org> wrote:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Jan Dittmer <jdi@....org> writes:
> >> Len Brown wrote:
> >> FATAL: drivers/acpi/button: sizeof(struct acpi_device_id)=20 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_acpi_device_table=144.
> > Are you cross-compiling?  The definition of kernel_ulong_t won't work on
> > x86.
> Yes, sorry, should have mentioned that. Build system is x86. Still,
> it didn't happen before the recent acpi merge.

I also have the same error, which I didn't have in 2.6.22:

FATAL: drivers/acpi/ac: sizeof(struct acpi_device_id)=20 is not a
modulo of the size of section __mod_acpi_device_table=48.
Fix definition of struct acpi_device_id in mod_devicetable.h
make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1

Build system is x86_64. I'm not cross-compiling, as the target machine
(not the build machine) is also x86_64.

 - Yasha
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/