linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/7] Simple Performance Counters: x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Aug 2007 11:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Simple Performance Counters: x86_64 support

On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > It is certainly interesting to compare alternative ways of handling the 
> > instruction streams by various processors or models of processors.
> 
> Well you have to do a lot more work then to handle instable TSCs then.

I have been using this for 2 years. It works fine for my purposes.

> In particular the frequencies can be different between CPUs, they 
> change (which you can catch with cpufreq notifiers) and during the
> cpufreq change period they're instable (as in you can't tell for
> some time which frequency they're currently running at and they
> might be running immediate frequencies) 

Well then simply make sure that they do not change while you measure.
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/