linux-kernel - Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:21:01 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>, Bret Towe <magnade@...il.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jan Kratochvil <honza@...os.cz>, jakub@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Is PIE randomization breaking klibc binaries?

On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Ulrich Kunitz wrote:

> Here is the .config file. I used it directly with 60bfba7e8 and could 
> reproduce the bug. (All other builds after the patch could also 
> reproduce the bug.) 

Thanks, I used your .config against 60bfba7e8 on x86_64, and still can't 
seem to be able to reproduce the problem:

linux-w027:~ # echo "test" | ./klibc-1.5/usr/utils/shared/cat
test
linux-w027:~ # echo "test" | ./klibc-1.5/usr/utils/static/cat
test

hpa, were you successful reproducing this?

Bret, I can see that you also reported some related segfaults, what were 
your conditions that triggered it please?

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/