linux-kernel - Re: [patch] genirq: fix simple and fasteoi irq handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:10:08 +0200
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jean-Baptiste Vignaud <vignaud@...dmail.fr>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	shemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-net <linux-net@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, marcin.slusarz@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch] genirq: fix simple and fasteoi irq handlers

On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:04:08AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl> wrote:
> 
> > I can't guarantee this is all needed to fix this bug, but I think this 
> > patch is necessary here.
> 
> hmmm ... very interesting! Now _this_ is something we'd like to see 
> tested. Could you send a patch to Marcin that also undoes the workaround 
> we have in place now, so that he could check whether ne2k-pci works fine 
> with your fix alone?

I'm not sure this is needed... Marcin got this patch, I hope, and I
don't have another possibility to contact with him. Since he managed
with this bisection and all the previous patches I don't think there
could be any problems, so:

Marcin! I'd be very glad if you could test this patch alone; this
should apply without any problems to 2.6.21 (with some offset) and
later "vanilla" versions (or try to revert Ingo's last patch with
patch -p1 -R). Please, contact me on any problems (alas not during
the weekend...).

Thanks,
Jarek P.

PS: of course, I'm very curious of this testing too, but, on the other
hand, as I've written earlier, I think this patch is needed for logical
reasons only, and it really doesn't look like it could make any damage
here.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/