lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 14:54:57 +0300 From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com> To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, riku.seppala@...p.net, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT] finish i386 and x86-64 sysdata conversion On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 01:49:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > Can you change > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno) > to > pci_scan_bus_on_node(int bus, struct pci_ops *ops, int node)? Do you anticipate passing in a different pci_ops or node? In any case please remember I am aiming for the minimal "obviously correc" change for 2.6.23... > pci_scan_bus_with_sysdata(int busno) make me feel that i need feed one > sysdata as on param for it. Yeah, lousy name, but the best I came up with. Runner up was 'x86_pci_scan_bus', which is I think worse? Cheers, Muli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists