linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Aug 2007 00:32:28 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	sukadev@...ibm.com
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] handle the multi-threaded init's exit() properly

On Mon, 6 Aug 2007 23:34:31 -0700 sukadev@...ibm.com wrote:

> | The downside of this approach is that
> | handle-the-multi-threaded-inits-exit-properly.patch looks more 2.6.24-ready
> | than all the container stuff (based just on overall impact and
> | speculativeness)
> 
> Well, if it will help, we can drop these two patches from -mm, take Oleg's
> patch and I can then resend these along with other pid ns patches. 
> 
> 	pid-namespaces-define-and-use-task_active_pid_ns-wrapper.patch.
> 	pid-namespaces-rename-child_reaper-function.patch

I'm reasonably sure that what I ended up with is OK.  I'll send those two
out again for double-checking, please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/