[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:14:24 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>,
Michael Sedkowski <sedmich@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disk spin down issue on shut down/suspend to disk
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Aug 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> emergency unload. Emergency unload does shorten the lifespan of the
>> disk but you don't have to worry too much about it. Disks are designed
>> to withstand certain number of emergency unloads.
>
> You *do* have to worry about it in any box you turn off daily. Desktop HDs
> will croak fast in that scenario, laptop HDs less so, but still too fast.
>
> A very good laptop HD can last about 20k emergency unloads (this is a unit
> that can do about 600k normal unloads in its lifetime). Desktop and server
> HDs don't even come close to those numbers, last time I checked.
It only matters on hard drives which actually use load-unload heads.
Lots of desktop/server drives (perhaps some laptop ones as well) still
use contact start/stop, which doesn't remove the heads from the platters
on shutdown but just parks the heads over the landing zone. I don't
think arbitrary power-offs make too much difference on those drives.
(However, these generally aren't rated to handle as many start/stop
cycles, which is why laptop drives generally use load/unload instead.)
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@...pamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists