[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:50:28 -0600
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To: Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
CC: Zan Lynx <zlynx@....org>, Jerry Jiang <wjiang@...ilience.com>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: why are some atomic_t's not volatile, while most are?
Chris Snook wrote:
> This is not a problem, since indirect references will cause the CPU to
> fetch the data from memory/cache anyway.
Isn't Zan's sample code (that shows the problem) already using indirect
references?
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists