linux-kernel - Re: Adding a security parameter to VFS functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:52:17 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	casey@...aufler-ca.com
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, torvalds@...l.org, viro@....linux.org.uk,
	sds@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	nfsv4@...ux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	selinux@...ho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding a security parameter to VFS functions

Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:

> 
> Could you describe how this compares to the proposal that the
> AppArmor developers suggested recently? I expect that we can 
> reduce the amount of discussion required, and maybe avoid some
> confusion if you could do that.

I don't know what that is.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/