linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] wait_task_zombie: don't fight with non-existing race with a dying ptracee

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wait_task_zombie: don't fight with non-existing race with a dying ptracee

> (textually depends on wait_task_zombie-remove-unneeded-child-signal-check.patch)
> 
> The "p->exit_signal == -1 && p->ptrace == 0" check and the comment are bogus.
> We already did exactly the same check in eligible_child(), we did not drop
> tasklist_lock since then, and both variables need write_lock(tasklist) to be
> changed.

I think this is correct.  IIRC, when the check was added, ->ptrace could be
cleared some other way.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/