lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 17 Aug 2007 08:04:17 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert.xu@...hat.com>
To:	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, sebastian@...akpoint.cc,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] i386: use asm() like the other atomic operations already do.

On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:23:49PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
>
> >You keep saying this yet everytime I ask for an example I
> >get nothing.
> 
> Just look for all the code (and there's an immense amount) that has a 
> barrier() between two atomic_* operations, or in a loop with such 
> operations.  With these patches merged, we can proceed to *remove* those 
> barriers.

When I say example I don't mean some hypothetical case, please
give actual function/file names.

Thanks,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ