[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 14:53:49 +0800
From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] dirty inode lists time delay/ordering fixes
Andrew,
Four bug fixes on the dirty inode lists :-)
They can be put immediately after the patch file named
writeback-fix-periodic-superblock-dirty-inode-flushing.patch:
[PATCH 1/6] writeback: fix time ordering of the per superblock inode lists 8
[PATCH 2/6] writeback: fix ntfs with sb_has_dirty_inodes()
[PATCH 3/6] writeback: remove pages_skipped accounting in __block_write_full_page()
[PATCH 4/6] writeback: introduce writeback_control.more_io to indicate more io
Also the check_dirty_inode_list.patch should be updated in place:
[PATCH 5/6] check dirty inode list
And this one is required to avoid warnings from the above debug patch:
[PATCH 6/6] prevent time-ordering warnings
Although not yet tested in highly parallel write workloads, I'm pretty sure
that the time ordering bug is gone :)
Thank you,
Fengguang
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists