linux-kernel - Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Introduce a new fields "gtime" and "cgtime" in task_struct and signal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:17:06 +0200
From:	Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net>
To:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc:	kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Introduce a new fields "gtime" and	"cgtime"
 in task_struct and signal_struct

Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Montag, 20. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
>> Index: kvm/fs/proc/array.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- kvm.orig/fs/proc/array.c    2007-08-20 11:11:30.000000000 +0200
>> +++ kvm/fs/proc/array.c 2007-08-20 13:04:03.000000000 +0200
> 
> Just a heads up, this patch collides with this fix in mm:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=118737949222362&w=2
> 
> If Ingo accepts this fix, your patch should be adopted in array.c to use 
> cputime_t for gtime as well. Lets see what Ingo thinks.

Thank you for the comment. No problem for me to rewrite the patch according the
fix in the mm.

Laurent
-- 
------------- Laurent.Vivier@...l.net  --------------
          "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)