lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:16:06 -0700
From:	Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@....com>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Kernel panic - not syncing: DMA: Memory would be corrupted

On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 06:09:48PM -0700, Jeremy Higdon wrote:
> > I traced the pci_alloc_consistent calls from PrimeIocFifos on my
> > system.  There are two calls for each ioc.  The first is for
> > 266368 bytes, the second for 16320 bytes.
> > 
> > I wonder why Kamalesh's system wants the slightly different
> > amount (263200 bytes) from what my system asks for?
> > 
> > It also looks to be a little unfriendly to swiotlb to ask for
> > more than 256K at a time (see IO_TLB_SEGSIZE) in swiotlb.c
> > 
> > -Tony
> 
> I believe those would vary a bit based on the exact firmware
> rev and perhaps nvram settings.  Also driver settings, but
> those are presumably the same.

> ioc0: LSI53C1030 C0: Capabilities={Initiator}                 | ioc0: LSI53C1030 B2: Capabilities={Initiator}
> scsi0 : ioc0: LSI53C1030 C0, FwRev=01032821h, Ports=1, MaxQ=2 | scsi0 : ioc0: LSI53C1030 B2, FwRev=01030a00h, Ports=1, MaxQ=2
> ioc1: LSI53C1030 C0: Capabilities={Initiator}                 | ioc1: LSI53C1030 B2: Capabilities={Initiator}
> scsi1 : ioc1: LSI53C1030 C0, FwRev=01032821h, Ports=1, MaxQ=2 | scsi1 : ioc1: LSI53C1030 B2, FwRev=01030a00h, Ports=1, MaxQ=2
> ioc2: LSI53C1030 C0: Capabilities={Initiator}                 | ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1d.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) ->


Actually, you can see that you have a different chip rev level and different
firmware revs, so that's probably why the requested sizes are a little
different.

Compare /proc/mpt/ioc0/info if you're curious.  There's probably a small
difference.

jeremy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ