lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:59:15 +0530 (IST)
From:	Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
cc:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: what is the value of the macro "__setup_param"?



On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:
> 
> > > > include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn, early)      \
> > > > include/linux/init.h:#define __setup_param(str, unique_id, fn)  /* nothing */
> 
> Notice the problem now? :-)

We should probably keep it that way. I don't see why anybody should be
using __setup_param directly anyway, so this becomes a nice build-time
error to flag such errant usage :-)

Seriously speaking, though, we should probably just get rid of that
wrong line. It's just an init.h-internal macro to be used by early_param
and __setup, and because those are themselves empty when MODULE, there's
no issues in removing the (unused, broken) __setup_param either.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ