linux-kernel - Re: file system for solid state disks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 25 Aug 2007 09:41:26 +0100
From:	Just Marc <marc@...ky.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: file system for solid state disks

Hi,

It's important to note that disk-replacement type SSDs perform much 
better with very small block operations, generally 512 bytes.  So the 
lower your file system block size, the better -- this will be the single 
most significant performance tweak one should do.   This is true for the 
benchmarks I've seen where the difference between 4KB and 512Byte block 
sizes was almost 100%.   YMMV -- always benchmark.

On SSDs which contain built in wear leveling, pretty much any file 
system can be used.   For SSDs that lack such low level housekeeping, 
use stuff like JFFS2.

Marc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/