| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:26:19 +0200 From: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com> To: "Daniel Walker" <dwalker@...sta.com> Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@....de>, eranian@....hp.com, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Natalie Protasevich" <protasnb@...il.com> Subject: Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: [..] > > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any bugs in a stable release can be > > > handled via email and/or bugzilla as we are presently doing? > > > > > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just > > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting > > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking? > > > > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release. > > Should we get the regression field fix before? Or had you planned on > just bypassing that completely ? IMO solution proposed by David http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/27/21 seems to be most reasonable. > > Daniel > > Regards, Michal -- LOG http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists