linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2007 01:41:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, bos@...pentine.com,
	werner@...esberger.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections

On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:41:27 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Rob Landley wrote:
> > > On Thursday 30 August 2007 1:28:17 pm Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >>
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >>> The old "ramdisk=<ram_size>" has been changed to
> > >>> "ramdisk_size=<ram_size>" to make it clearer.  The original
> > >>> "ramdisk=<ram_size>" has been kept around for compatibility
> > >>> reasons, but it may be removed in the future.
> > >> ...
> > >>
> > >> i just the other day submitted a patch to remove that backward
> > >> compatibility, and the m68k portion of it has already been
> > >> acked by geert uytterhoeven.
>
> I couldn't find it.  Can you provide a pointer to it?

sure.  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=118828410509208&w=2
>
> > > Could you mention it in feature-removal-schedule.txt?  (People
> > > check that for warning of upcoming changes that impact existing
> > > code.  They may not notice something elsewhere after they've got
> > > it working...)
> > >
> >
> > The same objection applies to this as to the previous one.  In
> > that respect, an Ack from a maintainer of an almost unused
> > architecture is meaningless (sorry, Geert.)
>
> Peter, what are you objecting to, Rob's comment, Robert's comment,
> Robert's patch, or my patch?

i'm sure he's objecting to my aforementioned patch.

rday
-- 
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/